Tyler Martinez
April 8, 2014
Kassens
Macroeconomics 122
When
asked, “How is money neutral,” I recently read a definition from a website that
states it is “An economic theory that states that changes in the aggregate money
supply only affect nominal variables, rather than real variables.”
(Investopedia, 2014). Neutrality of
money is said to be extremely related to classical dichotomy: the theoretical
separation of nominal and real values.
According to Professor
Patinkin money will only be neutral if there is perfect wage, no money
illusion, no distribution effects, no concerning interest rates, and no inside
and outside money. Inside money are
things such as securities and bonds, while outside money is things such as
foreign exchange and gold. In other
words, this is saying that if money supply increases during a long period of
time, then price and job will rise, but this would have no effect on gross
domestic product (GDP), unemployment levels, or prices in the real world. For example, the price of one cd is $15 and
the price of one pizza is $10. If we are
looking at relative price, 15/10 = 1.5… or 1.5 pizzas per cd. If the central bank doubles the money supply
making the cd $30 and the pizza $20, the relative price, or real variable is
not affected. (30/20 = 1.5)
This theory also
implies that the central bank does not affect our economy when makes currency. The problem with the theory of money
neutrality is that it is said to only work with long periods of time; for short
periods of time, it DOES affect GDP, unemployment levels, and prices in the
real world. Although the theory is said
to only work in long periods of time, it may also work during short periods of
time as well. Yes, when supply of money
changes in a short period, it does affect nominal variables, but the
“stickiness” of prices and wages can override these outcomes. Prices and wages are said to be sticky
because it is easier to increase prices and wages, but it is difficult to
decrease prices and wages; for example, it is hard to get an employee to accept
a pay cut. Therefore, a modification in
money supply does not affect the economy in the long run developing an economic
equilibrium…or the neutrality of money.
References
Neutrality Of Money In Classical
Model | Economics Exposed. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://economics-exposed.com/neutrality-of-money-in-classical-model/
Neutrality Of Money Definition |
Investopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neutrality_of_money.asp
No comments:
Post a Comment