Emily Comer
Blog Post #1
21 April 2016
Following the overthrow of Fulgencio Batista by Fidel Castro in Havana
in 1959, Castro increased Cuban trade with he Soviet Union and increased taxes
on American imports. In return, the United States ceased Cuban sugar imports
and placed a ban on exports to Cuba, which was then boosted into an embargo
with travel restrictions. By 1961 there were no longer diplomatic ties between
the United States and Cuba and the 1996 Helms-Burton Act enforced that by
stating that the embargo would remain unless Cuba became a democratic
government and was no longer under Castro. The only trade that
occurs with the embargo in place is some medical and agricultural supplies
from the United States. It is estimated in the article that this embargo
between Cuba and the United States has created an economic loss of $1.126
trillion dollars in trade for Cuba. Since economic principles state that trade
makes everyone better off, Cuba and the United States losing each other as
trading partners due to the embargo must negatively affect them. With the two
countries not being able to import or export to one another, they have to try
to find alternatives, which could be importing and exporting elsewhere or
producing the goods ontheir own. This can easily become costly and likely plays
a role in Cuba’s slow economic growth. Based on the information from the UN
Comtrade website, Cuba's imports are much higher than their exports, which
means that the country has negative net exports. Also, because net exports and
net capital outflow are equal to one another, this data shows that Cuba's
net capital outflow is negative. This means that Cuba has to purchase many more
goods from outside the country than they are selling. Since this is true, it
can be determined that Cuba's has very little economic growth, compared to
other countries with positive net exports and net capital outflow. Cuba's need
to import more resources would not be as bad for their economy if there
was not a trade embargo between them and the United States, because Cuba can
get goods cheaper from its surrounding areas. Since the United States is close,
it is likely that Cuba would be able to get its goods at a less detrimental
price than they currently are paying from distant countries. In January 2015, the Unites States began allowing people to travel to Cuba for special purposes without a government license and airlines began flying normal commercial flights to the country. Also, it relaxed some of the economic sanctions like the allowing the use of U.S. credit cards and shipping construction materials to private companies in Cuba. A year later, in January 2016, and then again in March 2016, the trading and travel regulations became even lighter. Although things have gotten better, it isn't likely that Helms-Burton will be repealed soon, which means that the two countries will continue to negatively affect one another's economic growth because of the embargo.
"U.S-Cuba Relations." Council on Foreign Relations. Council on Foreign Relations, n.d. Web. 20 Apr. 2016. <http://www.cfr.org/cuba/us-cuba-relations/p11113>
"UN Comtrade Demo | SAS® Visual Analytics." UN Comtrade Demo | SAS® Visual Analytics. SAS, n.d. Web. 20 Apr. 2016. <http://www.sas.com/software/visual-analytics/demos/un-comtrade-basic.html>.
No comments:
Post a Comment